Skip to content

72% De-Risk vs. Manage Risk

A problem with few solutions


An issue on our minds - and on many of the minds we talk to - is what can we really do about de-risking?  For years, there has been a lot of talk and very little action; something we are working to help solve at Sigma Ratings. 

As a quick primer: De-risking occurs when one institution exits a business relationship with another due to cost or specific risk issues. 

With this in mind, Thomson Reuters recently released an illuminating 2018 report on the “True Cost of Financial Crime” that delves into a number of topical issues.  While not the report’s focus, de-risking is mentioned along with some of the supporting survey data:

“72% [of respondents] say they de-risk by avoiding, rather than managing, heightened risk customers. The impact in terms of lost opportunities at both organizational and national level is difficult to quantify, but it is likely to impact productivity and economic development.”

While not totally surprising, the number seems large and, in effect, means that significant amounts of business and opportunity are left on the table (across both banking and across corporate relationships).

Other research, including by the Economist, suggest that correspondent banking relationships are down across every region of the world (with Eastern Europe, Oceania and Latin America hit the hardest).

Improving cost efficiencies for organizations to stay engaged with one another, can also be tied to reducing compliance burden.  At Sigma Ratings, we are working to normalize risk at scale, provide more dynamic reporting and create deep comparisons that are today largely based on intuition (which is highly susceptible to bias).

You can read the referenced report here.

AML Compliance Regulations Financial Crime Ratings Risk Management
Sigma Loading