During recent conversations in Washington, DC, the Sigma360 team engaged with various leaders working on the front lines of financial crime and risk management. These discussions revealed a clear pattern. The strategies, technologies, and enforcement models used to combat illicit finance are struggling to keep pace with how trafficking networks and criminal facilitators now operate. Meaning, we are at risk of falling further behind without renewed action.
A network that learns faster than enforcement
Fentanyl trafficking remains a central focus. Cryptocurrency continues to serve as a key vector for value transfer, though many of the actors involved demonstrate weak operational discipline. Wallet reuse, transactional mistakes, and exposed identifiers persist. While these vulnerabilities provide opportunities for detection, they are not permanent. Threat actors learn quickly. What worked yesterday will not hold tomorrow, which necessitates a flexible and dynamic risk posture.
Other concerns are harder to address. According to some, aspects of interagency coordination on these threats have been degraded. Where there was once cross-department alignment, today there are competing priorities and fragmented enforcement. Critical intelligence can be delayed or siloed, and actionable leads are often lost in the gap between jurisdictions. The result is not inefficiency. It is exposure and will require work to fix to meet the current Administration’s focus on cartels and other related priorities.
Designations without direction
Compounding this is the uncertainty created by recent cartel-related terror designations. While highly visible, these actions have introduced a degree of operational ambiguity that would benefit from further guidance from the government. Compliance teams are left without specific guidance, unsure whether or how to adjust their programs. The result here is the uneven activity to meet cartel-related risk, with the best resourced institutions moving faster and more proactively.
As noted in our recent blog, Understanding the Threat of Mexican Drug Cartels, these organizations are no longer confined to the patterns traditionally associated with trafficking. They are embedded in commerce and commercial activities. Their laundering operations are decentralized, often managed by third-party networks with longstanding financial ties. Their logistics are flexible, often relying on freelance smugglers operating on social platforms. And their resilience comes from redundancy, not centralization.
The system was not built for this
This evolution poses serious challenges for financial institutions. Traditional typologies are no longer sufficient. Structured data alone cannot capture what is material. And the risk is no longer only in the transaction itself, but in how disconnected institutions are from the context behind it.
What emerged from these conversations in DC is not speculative. It reflects how the threat environment has already changed. Financial crime is now increasingly organized, modular, and fluid. Meanwhile, the systems tasked with detecting it remain fragmented, dependent, and reactive.
The signals are clear. The question is whether those in a position to respond are willing to act before the next iteration of risk becomes even harder to detect.
How can Sigma360 help me stay ahead?
Using Sigma360's risk decisioning software platform, organizations can not only get ahead of risk, but leverage unstructured data - like the screening examples highlighted in this article.
To see Sigma360 in action, book a demo
